[4 March 2016] The final policy direction has been published.

Policy Direction Broadband Pricing

The substance of the policy direction has been distilled to its essence – that ICASA must proceed urgently to use its pro-competitive power under Chapter 10 of the Electronic Communications Act 36 of 2005 to create a regulatory framework that promotes competition in broadband markets.

While this is a statement of the obvious, it will hopefully spur the regulator into focused action (although it is impossible to ignore the historical failings and continued lack of capacity of ICASA).

Full text:

POLICY DIRECTION ON EFFECTIVE COMPETITION IN BROADBAND MARKETS AND THE REDUCTION OF DATA COSTS

1. Background

1.1 Government is committed to ensure effective competition in the broadband market. This is supported by the following:

1.1.1 The National Development Plan, 2030 (NDP) notes that” The high domestic cost of broadband internet connectivity is a major hindrance” to amongst other things, scientific and technological advancement.

1.1.2 The goals identified in the NDP include that of universal access and availability of a wide range of converged services at a “cost and quality at least equal to South Africa’s main peers and competitors”.

1.1.3 The National Broadband Policy (South Africa Connect) adopted in 2013, states that the high prices charged for communications services are identified as one of the primary factors hampering South Africa’s competitiveness. It further emphasizes that access to broadband must be affordable to lead to economic growth.

1.1.4 South Africa remains one of the most expensive countries in the African Broadband Price Index (Research ICT Africa Broadband Policy Brief No. 3, June 2014).

1.2 In order to realise the policy intent of Government as derived from both the NDP and SA Connect to make broadband more affordable for end users, effective competition in broadband markets is necessary.

1.3 The Minister has the authority in terms of the Electronic Communications Act, 2005 (Act No. 36 of 2005) to issue policy directions to the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (the Authority).

2. Policy Direction

2.1 The Authority is hereby directed, in terms of section 3(2) of the Electronic Communications Act, 2005 (Act No. 36 of 2005) to prioritize the commencement and conclusion of an inquiry and the prescription of regulations as contemplated in section 67(4) of the Electronic Communications Act to ensure effective competition in broadband markets.

___

[4 November 2015] The Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services has published a draft policy direction calling on ICASA to take steps to use Chapter 10 of the Electronic Communications Act to investigate the broadband market in South Africa and consider whether pro-competitive obligations should be imposed on some or all licensees in order to promote competition in the provision of broadband services.

Draft Policy Broadband Competition & Reducing Data Costs 

Comments are due by  Friday 18 December 2015 and may be emailed to:

  • The Acting Director-General, Department of Telecommunications and Postal Services
  • For attention: Ms. C Lesufi, The Director, Telecommunications Policy
  • data@dtps.gov.za

Full text:

  1. Introduction

The National Development Plan, 2030 (NDP) states that – “By 2030, ICT will underpin the development of a dynamic and connected information society and a vibrant knowledge economy that is more inclusive and prosperous. A seamless information infrastructure will be universally available and accessible and will meet the needs of citizens, business and the public sector, providing access to the creation and consumption of a wide range of converged services required for effective economic and social participation – at a cost and quality at least equal to South Africa’s main peers and competitors… ICT will continue to reduce spatial exclusion, enabling seamless participation by the majority in the global ICT system, not simply as users but as content developers and application

The NDP notes that “The high domestic cost of broadband internet connectivity is a major hindrance” to amongst other things, scientific and technological.

The goals identified in the NDP include that of universal access and availability of a wide range of converged services at a “cost and quality at least equal to South Africa’s main peers and competitors”.

The NDP states that “In future, the State’s role in the ICT sector will be to facilitate competition and private investment and to ensure effective regulation where market failure is apparent.”

In the National Broadband Policy (South Africa Connect) adopted in 2013, the vision for broadband is that by 2020, 100% of SA citizens will have access to broadband services at 2,5% or less of the population’s average monthly income.

SA Connect states that the high prices charged for communications services are identified as one of the primary factors hampering South Africa’s competitiveness. It further emphasizes that access to broadband must be affordable to lead to economic growth.

South Africa remains one of the most expensive countries in the African Broadband Price Index (Research ICT Africa Broadband Policy Brief No. 3, June 2014).

The Deputy Minister in her budget vote speech of 21 May 2015 noted that the cost of ICTs in South Africa is too high.

In order to realise the policy intent of Government as derived from both the NDP and SA Connect to make broadband more affordable for end users, regulatory intervention is necessary in the broadband market.

  1. Policy Direction

In terms of section 67(4) of the Electronic Communications Act, 2005 (Act No. 36 of 2005) the Authority must, following an inquiry, prescribe regulations defining the relevant markets and market segments and impose appropriate and sufficient pro-competitive licence conditions on licensees where there is ineffective competition, and if any licensee has significant market power in such markets or market segments.

It is necessary for the Authority to prescribe regulations defining the broadband markets, and where there is ineffective competition, impose pro-competitive conditions on licensees with significant market power in such broadband markets.

The Authority should ensure that effective competition exists in the broadband markets since effective competition contributes to the reduction of data

The Authority is hereby directed, in terms of section 3(2) of the Electronic Communications Act to commence an inquiry and prescribe regulations as contemplated in 67(4) of the Electronic Communications Act to ensure effective competition in broadband markets